Effectiveness of SB4 Transition from Originator Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Subgroup Analysis from the BENEFIT Study.

Objectives: The pan-European BENEFIT study of patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who transitioned from reference etanercept to SB4 found no clinically meaningful changes in disease control after transition. The analysis aims to illustrate the peculiarities of the Italian cohort of patients compared with the whole population to provide a more real-life approach to the data for the Italian rheumatologists, ruling out possible local confounding factors. Methods: A prospective study for up to 6 months following transition was conducted. Outcome measures of interest include clinical characteristics at time of transition and disease activity scores (Disease Activity Score-28 [DAS28] for RA, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] for axSpA) over time and safety. Results: One-hundred and eleven subjects (out of the 557 in total enrolled in the study) were derived from 8 Italian sites, including 79 with RA and 32 with axSpA. In both cohorts, the efficacy was maintained at 3 months and 6 months from the transition to the biosimilar with no significant change in mean DAS28 and BASDAI scores: at the end of the 6 months of observation the mean DAS28 and BASDAI was similar to baseline (confidence interval [CI] -0.22, 0.22), while the mean variation of the BASDAI was -0.14. Of note, 100.0% (95% CI 89.1, 100.0) in the axSpA and 90.8% (95% CI 81.5, 95.5) in the RA cohort of patients continued to receive SB4 at month 6 (binary variable with 95% Clopper-Pearson CI). Conclusions: Italian patients with stable RA or axSpA who transitioned from originator Etanercept to SB4 maintained clinical response at 6 months post-transition. Both the cohorts are representative of typical patients with long-standing established diagnoses. Most of the patients transitioned to the same dose regimen of biosimilar as that received for the originator, and the regimen remained unchanged at 6 months, supporting the effectiveness of the transition.

Topical Application of a Galenical Formulation for the Management of Everolimus-Induced Mucositis in Patients with Metastatic Cancer: a Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Stomatitis is a common and potentially dose-limiting adverse event of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor therapy. To minimize dose reductions or treatment delays that may affect therapeutic outcomes, management includes patient education, pain management strategies, and drug treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a topically-applied galenical preparation to minimize the impact of everolimus-associated oral mucositis in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Patients receiving everolimus plus exemestane for advanced breast cancer or everolimus alone for advanced renal cancer were eligible for inclusion. All patients were advised on procedures to maintain good oral hygiene and directed to use a dexamethasone-containing galenical preparation at the first signs of mucositis. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, and after cycles one, two, and three to evaluate the presence, duration, and intensity of oral mucositis. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients included in the study (mean age 66 years; 16% male), mucositis developed in 10.5%, 47.4%, and 52.6% of patients after the first, second, and third cycles of everolimus, respectively. The median time to development of mucositis was 18.0 days, and the median time to mucositis resolution was 30.0 days. After the first, second, and third cycles of therapy, 5.3%, 10.5%, and 10.5% of patients required interruption of everolimus therapy; however, no dosage reductions for mucositis were necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education and the provision of an effective galenical preparation can minimize the effect of mTOR inhibitor-related mucositis.

Targeted therapy in renal carcinoma: a case of long-term effect with complete control of toxicity.

Although advances in imaging techniques have allowed earlier diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in recent decades, one-third of patients who have undergone radical resection of organ-confined disease will eventually develop metastases. The treatment of metastatic RCC was revolutionized by the advent of targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We have followed seven patients with metastatic RCC who were treated with first-line pazopanib at our center. The case of one of these patients is described here in detail. The patient was first diagnosed with RCC in 1999 and metastases were detected in 2006 and 2012. Treatment with pazopanib at the standard dose of 800 mg/day for 29 months led to a partial response that persisted over time. Side effects (hypertension and painful mucositis) were successfully managed with supportive care at our oral therapy clinic. Early management of adverse events using a multidisciplinary approach is paramount to the favorable outcome of treatment with pazopanib and other targeted agents.

Improvement of quality of life in third-line chemotherapy with lapatinib in a case of metastatic breast cancer.

We describe a case of a 72-year-old patient suffering from metastatic breast cancer. The disease had progressed slowly and was almost asymptomatic for a significant time. Toxicity, following third-line treatment with lapatinib, was not significant, and side effects were well controlled. The case is an excellent example of a chronic neoplastic disease in a patient who could be defined as "long-surviving".